Charlotte Apr 2014: Public impediments
The following impediments were identified by the Charlotte CSM class this week. Again, we may have dups, although that probably is an indicator of relatively higher occurence.
- Business – IT not aligned
- Poor test practices
- Set date before project begins
- Over documentation
- Poor communication
- Unclear roles
- Lack of resources
- Disengaged customer
- Uncontrolled team member egos
- Lack of accountability
- Funding cut
- Cutting corners on testing
- Lack of risk management
- Changed mind about what you wanted
- External factors
- Hidden agenda from stakeholders
- Not understand critical path
- Too many managers
- Change in environment
- Stakeholder awareness & involvement
- No process
- No teamwork
- Clarity (lack of)
- Revert ways
- Process disagreements
- Missed requirements
- Over commitment — under achieving
- Lack of leadership
- Inflexibility // dates
- Unrealistic deadlines
- Market / customer
- Urgency, speed
- Unclear requirements
- Lack of communication
- No documentation
- Analysis paralysis
- Skills [lack of]
I am not sure I fully understand (now) what each of these meant. Also, maybe if I explored some, I might disagree that they are really impediments. For example, if something just must get done by X date, that can just be reality (assuming it is indeed true that we *must get it done by that date). Calling reality an impediment is just not helpful.
More generally, though, we have impediments until the team is the best Scrum team in the whole world. Once you can accurately declare your team is the best, then by all means, please stop improving.
« « Question: Advice to a beginning ScrumMaster || Agile Velocity | Estimating Initial Agile Velocity » »