“There are many things you do not understand, and therefore we ask, ‘Why don’t you just go ahead and take action? Try to do something.'”
With the idea, you thus cut the Gordian knot of inaction and start real learning.
What happens if we do not? The opposite:
“And thus the native hue of resolution is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought.”
And enterprises of great pitch and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry
And lose the name of action.
I have been in projects like that, and so have many of you. (These last two quotes are from a play, not Fujio Cho.) The soft spider web of thought can be the hardest, most granite-like roadblock.
Yesterday, I finished helping teach a Certified ScrumMaster course with Jeff Sutherland, so, a couple of related thoughts from several conversations.
1. Spontaneous Organization
In the Agile community, we are fond of self-organization and complex adaptive systems, and these ideas go way back. Chuangtze and Laotze taught us that the Tao that can be expressed is not the true Tao. Tao organizes itself in things great and small, and Chuangtze especially talked about the spontaneous organization of things, nature, people and society. If left alone, they would move toward Tao — that human meddling would more likely move them away from Tao. Better they take on that more perfect imperfection of Tao, he seemed to say.
These ideas were picked up later by others, Proudon and Hayek for example. Tolstoy speaks of this when he talks about the hive of Moscow after the battle of Borodino in “War and Peace.” We see this in the things of nature, where energy and mass self-organize at the speed of light — OK, perhaps a play on Einstein — but there is a natural organic spontaneous organization of things.
Now, in real life, that spontaneous organization of a team might be at a mediocre level or a hyper-productive level. The ScrumMaster may have more influence over this fork in the road than they have accepted.
I suggest to you that the ScrumMaster, at least, think deeply on how to put these mere thoughts into action for each team, and stir the pot gently. Maybe start here.
It is by spontaneous order that free enterprise gives you your daily bread, however, much we may say (and it is true) that man does not live by bread alone — still, we must have bread.
In the ineluctable contradictions of things, we humans have this wish for things, for life, to be simple. And so in some ways it is indeed. “A kiss is still a kiss.” But we are everyday forced, if we allow our eyes to see, that in so many things there are contradictions. Male and female. Good and bad. Black and white. Darkly wise and rudely great. Go fast slowly. Achieve by not trying. I must be cruel only to be kind.
It may seem that these contradictions hold us back. From a certain point of view, maybe they do, but in other ways they do not. They must only be balanced.
For a pedestrian example, the ScrumMaster should be a servant-leader. The team should use velocity to push back at the magical-thinking managers who demand they double output; and the next minute demand of themselves that they push velocity to hyper-productivity. From a certain point of view, these can seem utter contradictions. In theory, we may think these contradictions should make us fail — in practice, done well, we come to know they do the opposite.
Perhaps a few of you will find the famous Butterfly Dream an apt koan for the harmonious contradistinction of things. Chuangtze has other, perhaps better, stories that deal with this.
ScrumMasters: They can cut through their mental spider webs in a minute, or in two years. You can be a key difference. This is your great refactoring work. Find that sharp, swift, gentle, liberating sword and pull it out. Use it gently.